Divisive, but Effectual: Reinstating the Draft Essay -- U.S. Military

Ever since World War II, the last war that garnered full American support, the percentage of American citizens enrolling in the U.S. Army has attenuated significantly. The U.S. is a major military power in the present world American soldiers atomic number 18 engaged in many multi-theater positions, consequently dispersing troops oer various regions worldwide. As only one in ten citizens has served in the US Army, American knowledge of military conditions is rapidly lessening along with the national harmony that complements such knowledge. Therefore, the comprehension that American security is closely associated with a formidable military never resonated within the greater part of modern American citizens. Although antiwar activists may decry compulsory conscription as unconstitutional, it needs to be reinstated in order to solidify the meaning of being an American citizen, boost the parsimoniousness by providing jobs, and unify the American hatful with enhanced homeland security .Generally, reinstating the Constitutional draft would solidify the meaning of being an American citizen. Often, wealthier and more privileged people are able to ask for exemption from serving, so representation of soldiers in combat is composed of less-privileged citizens. With compulsory conscription, all American citizens, men or women, ages 18-26 are subject to be recruited for the armed forces. In fact, only 4 members of the 107th Congress who voted in favor of the Iraq war had children serving there. Politicians would know how it feels to have loved ones in a war, instead of freely speaking about wartime without experiencing it in any way. 1 (206) Americans feel that public support for war in foreign countries is not strong because the soldiers fighting are poorly rep... ... CQ Researcher Outline, January 11, 1991. http//library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre1991011100 (accessed March 19, 2012).Binding the Nation National Service in America. U.S. Army War College, 2008. ht tp//www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/Articles/08winter/grigsby.pdf (accessed March 12, 2012). bring out about National Service. Americans for a National Service Act, . nationalserviceact.org (accessed March 19, 2012). Greenblatt, Alan. Upward Mobility. CQ Researcher, April 29, 2005. http//www.cqpress.com/product/Researcher-Upward-Mobility-v15-16.html (accessed March 14, 2012).Farrell, Brenda S. Military Personnel Evaluation Methods Linked to Anticipated Outcomes take to Inform Decisions on Army Recruitment Incentives. U.S. Government Accountability Office, September 19, 2008. http//www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-1037R (accessed March 19, 2012).

The Devil in Joyce Carol Oates Where Are You Going, Where Have You Bee

The Devil in Joyce Carol Oates Where argon You Going, Where Have You Been? Her name is Connie, and she is not unlike many girls of the period she lives in. She is vain, she is constantly at war with her family, and she is in an incredible rush to grow up. Her race to maturity is the trait focused on in Joyce Carol Oates Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been. It splits Connie into two different personalities One for home, and one for anywhere that was not home (431). Everything astir(predicate) her?her walk, her smile, and her laugh?metamorphoses as soon as she steps out the front door. The baby is hidden, the seductive young woman emerges, and the world of the ?big kids? is more than willing to take her in. This world is what she thinks she wants, until the day a shiny golden convertible pulls into her driveway and the the mysterious Arnold Friend emerges. Through Arnold Friend, Connie learns that her rush to grow up is foolish and that she is trying to jump in to a world that she knows nothing about and that could be potentially dangerous. She ultimately releases her dream and clings to her family as never before, realizing that their firm grasp on her is not for their benefit, but her own. Joyce Carol Oates?s vivid description of Arnold Friend carries the around emotional freight, as the evil behind his apparent glamor brings about Connie?s change. Though he takes the outer appearance of a normal boy, everything about his behavior suggests that he is the Devil himself in disguise. The most obvious aspects of Arnold Friend that suggest that he is the Devil in disguise are his physical features. For example, several(prenominal) references are made to the abnormality of his feet. As he walks about, he stumbles... ...s images of Arnold Friend, suggesting that he is the Devil in disguise, make the story both moving and successful. Connie?s dread at the face of the Devil is shared by Oates?s audience, making it easier for them to u nderstand both the emotional impact of her struggle and the gravity of the lesson being taught by the story things are not always as they seem. Connie?s fright at the discovery of Arnold?s true nature is comparable to Eve?s fright at the awareness of good and evil. Connie jumped into a world that was as appealing to her as the serpent?s shiny red apple was to Eve, only if to discover that everything beyond the savory exterior was fraught with venomous poison. Reference Oates, Joyce Carol, ?Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?? reprinted in X.J. Kennedy?s Literature An introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama, 5th ed (Harper Collins, 1991).

Jonsons Volpone :: Jonson Volpone

 Homosexual Overtones in Volpone    During the metempsychosis, women did not participate in the theatre hence, men, dressed in drag, played womens percentages. This particular characteristic of Renaissance drama adds many dimensions, erotic and social, to the spectacle on the stage. However, The primary difficulty in surveying this landscape results from the strong indications that early modern eroticism was fundamentally divergent from that today. Consequently, the challenge deciphering what may be radically different cultural codes for the Rena issance is formidable (Zimmerman 7). The interactions between cross-dressed boy actors and the adult young-begetting(prenominal) actors, by todays standards, would be considered homo-erotic. In Ben Johnsons Volpone, the role of Celia, the main fe mannish character, would have be en played by a cross-dressed boy hence, many inferences about Renaissance eroticism may be made by exploring the element of cross-dressing and h ow it transforms the action on stage and the audiences perception. Celia (played by a cross-dressed boy) interacts with men throughout the play. The scene in which Volpone attempts to rape Celia could be construed as extremely homo-erotic. Volpone desires Celia, yet she refuses to succumb to his advances thus he trie s to force himself upon her. Bonario is Celias true love interest, which also has homosexual overtones. The sexual and intimate interactions between Celia and the manful characters creates an interesting dynamic. For instance, When an actor in a male role did not need to impersonate adult-ness, his interaction with a cross-dressed actor, particularly a cross-dressed boy, change. Presumably, the adult actor, by virtue of age, voice, physical appearance and interpretive range, lent credence to the (usually) heterosexual valences of cross-dressing within that fiction. The dual lens on the dramatic action that the adult male actor provided was in all likelihood angled most directly at adult male spectators (Zimmerman 46). The actors are interacting like hete rosexuals of the opposite sex, however, the fact that it is really two males blurs the lines of what the audience was actually seeing and enjoying. Celia was obviously made to be attractive to the male spectators, because she is the main female love interest in the play. The male spectators may be attracted to what aesthetically appears to be a woman, or they may be attracted to an androgynous, cr oss-dressed boy. Hence, Celias appeal is twofold.

Different Worlds of Black Girl Lost and Baby of the Family :: Black Girl Lost Essays

Different Worlds of Black Girl Lost and Baby of the Family Although, African Americans be considered minorities in the United States, not all of them live in meagerness. Many African Americans live in a middle class society along with the dominant culture. However, many African Americans do not live in a middle class society, but rather live in poverty and have to suffer along with this poverty. For instance, Donald Goiness Black Girl Lost and Tina McElroy Ansas Baby of the Family, cardinal narrative novels, that exposit the difference in two young African American girls lives and the society in which they inhabit. Not only do these young African American girls institute the two sides of poverty, they also represent how barbarianren can also qualify in the minority category. For example, Sandra lives in a run down apartment with a drunk mformer(a) who could care slight about her daughter. In addition, Sandra remains all on her own and has to find ways in which to survive eac h day. But on the other hand, Lena lives in a nice size home with her two parents, her two brothers, and her grandmother, all who love her very much. Moreover, Lena has many family members who look after her and take extra redundant care for her because she is the baby of the family. Although, both Sandra and Lena lead very different lives, both are faced with challenges as a minority and as a child which questions their view on life. The home in which a child lives in is suppose to be a place of warmth, love, and protection. A home also offers other important aspects into a childs life, for instance, self-confidence, pride, and security. If a child does not reside in a home that offers warmth, love, and protection, that child will not savor good about herself or the home in which she lives in. A child wants a home that he or she can be proud of plenty to bring home a friend or two. In addition, if a child does not feel safe and secure in his or her home, therefore she will not posses these qualities in the outside world. Moreover, their lack of security can cause major disruptions and distractions within their everyday routine, like with Sandra. For example, the homes that Lena and Sandra live in illustrate the exact opposite of each other.

Does The Government Control Our Rights? :: essays research papers fc

How many rights do you control? You should check, because it might not be as many as you think. Some people are not concerned that the police can execute a search warrant without knocking, set up roadblocks, and interrogate innocent citizens. Nor are they concerned when a drug dealer receives a life sentence for selling a quarter gram of cocain for $20 (Bailey). When you combine current events with the widespread need of people to fit into society, we should all be concerned. The Bill of Rights, when written, established and protected our personal warrantdoms from government interference. For centuries, governments have tried to regulate information thought to be inappropriate or offensive. Todays technology has given the government an excuse to interfere with free speech. By claiming that radio frequencies are a limited resource, the government tells broadcasters what to say and what not to say. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) carefully monitors news, public, and loc al programming for what they consider obscenity (Hyland). As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for government intrusion in the press. The Secret Service can confiscate computers, printers, hard disks, and mail from electronic run they do not consider a press. Entire stores of books and videotapes are seized because of sexually explicit material. The Bill of Rights and the First Amendment exists to protect speech and press that is unpopular. Everyone has the right to exemption of opinion and expression (Steele). If unpopular ideas did not exist, we would not need the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is so commonly challenged that it has its own name heavy weapon control. Banning weapons not for legitimate sporting purposes is a misuse of the right to bear arms amendment. If the need for defense arises, it will not be herds of deer that threaten our security, but humans (Steele). It is an unfortunate fact that the guns we need for defense are guns that attack people not animals. The right to be secure in your home goes hand in hand with the right to bear arms. A law that went into effect in 1991 allows the tax assessor to enter your home and nominate your personal property for tax purposes. Being required to tell the state everything you own and submitting to an invasion by the taxman is not being secure in your home. Maybe that is why the government controls guns.

Does The Government Control Our Rights? :: essays research papers fc

How many propers do you have? You should check, because it might not be as many as you think. Some people are not concerned that the police can execute a search warrant without knocking, behave up roadblocks, and interrogate innocent citizens. Nor are they concerned when a drug dealer receives a life sentence for selling a quarter universal gravitational constant of cocaine for $20 (Bailey). When you combine current events with the widespread need of people to fit into society, we should all be concerned. The Bill of Rights, when written, established and protected our personal freedoms from political relation come innce. For centuries, governments have tried to regulate information thought to be inappropriate or offensive. Todays technology has given the government an excuse to interfere with free speech. By claiming that radio frequencies are a limited resource, the government tells broadcasters what to say and what not to say. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) caref ully monitors news, public, and local programming for what they consider crud (Hyland). As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for government intrusion in the press. The Secret Service can confiscate computers, printers, hard disks, and mail from electronic services they do not consider a press. Entire stores of books and videotapes are seized because of sexually explicit material. The Bill of Rights and the First Amendment exists to protect speech and press that is unpopular. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression (Steele). If unpopular ideas did not exist, we would not need the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is so commonly challenged that it has its own reboot gun control. Banning weapons not for legitimate sporting purposes is a misuse of the right to bear arms amendment. If the need for defense arises, it will not be herds of deer that threaten our security, but humans (Steele). It is an unfortunate fact that the guns we need for def ense are guns that attack people not animals. The right to be guarantee in your root goes hand in hand with the right to bear arms. A law that went into effect in 1991 allows the tax assessor to enter your home and list your personal property for tax purposes. Being required to tell the state everything you own and submitting to an invasion by the taxman is not being untouchable in your home. Maybe that is why the government controls guns.